Exploring English Spelling Errors among EFL Learners in Language Schools: A Case Study of Tshangu District, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo.

Authors

  • Roger Mboma Kwenge National Scientific Council, Ministry of Higher Education, Universities, Scientific Research, and Innovation, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo Author
  • Bostand Tshakala Kaketi National Scientific Council, Ministry of Higher Education, Universities, Scientific Research, and Innovation, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo Author
  • Dorcas Anasambi Totamba National Scientific Council, Ministry of Higher Education, Universities, Scientific Research, and Innovation, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo Author
  • Alexandre Yusuf Agbe Ngungu National Scientific Council, Ministry of Higher Education, Universities, Scientific Research, and Innovation, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59228/rcst.026.v5.i3.345

Keywords:

EFL learners, English spelling, error analysis, grapheme, phonology

Abstract

This mixed-methods study examined English spelling errors and learners’ perceptions of English spelling in language schools in Tshangu District, Kinshasa. The quantitative component used a questionnaire distributed to 90 learners, of whom 85 returned usable responses. A qualitative interview component was also reported; however, the manuscript gives inconsistent interview sample sizes (10 versus 20), which must be resolved before publication. Error analysis was used to identify and classify misspellings, and a corpus of 90 misspelled forms is provided in the appendix. Descriptive findings indicate substantial use of pronunciation-based spelling and frequent graphemic errors. Because several tables contain internal inconsistencies between frequencies and percentages, inferential claims and exact prevalence estimates should not be made until the dataset and tables are reconciled. The findings nevertheless support the need for explicit instruction linking English phonology, grapheme–phoneme correspondences, morphological spelling rules, and systematic feedback on recurrent errors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Jarf, R. (2010). Spelling error corpora in EFL. Sino-US English Teaching, 7(1), 6–15. https://doi.org/10.17265/1539-8072/2010.01.002

Ali, A. Y. (2004). The meaning of the Holy Qur’an (11th ed.). Amana Publications.

Benyo, A. A. F. (2014). English spelling problems among students at the University of Dongola, Sudan. Educational Research, 5(9), 361–367. https://doi.org/10.14303/er.2014.247

Bhela, B. (1999). Native language interference in learning a second language: Exploratory case studies of native language interference with target language usage. International Education Journal, 1(1), 22–31.

Brown, H. D. (2004). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices. Longman.

Corder, S. P. (1974). Error analysis. In J. P. B. Allen & S. P. Corder (Eds.), Techniques in applied linguistics (pp. 122–154). Oxford University Press.

Corder, S. P. (1981). Error analysis and interlanguage. Oxford University Press.

Douglas, C. (2000). Developing critical thinking for children through English foreign language learning. University of Cairo.

Dulay, H. C., Burt, M. K., & Krashen, S. D. (1982). Language two. Oxford University Press.

Fithriani, R. (2018). Cultural influences on students’ perceptions of written feedback in L2 writing. Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Learning, 3(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.18196/ftl.3124

Fitria, T. N. (2018). Error analysis found in students’ writing composition of simple future tense. ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 1(3), 240–251. https://doi.org/10.34050/els-jish.v1i3.5028

Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. W. (2006). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications (8th ed.). Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.

Harmer, J. (2001). The practice of English language teaching (3rd ed.). Longman.

Harris, D. P. (1969). Testing English as a second language. McGraw-Hill.

Healey, P. (2010). Making better places: The planning project in the twenty-first century. Palgrave Macmillan.

Hemchua, S., & Schmitt, N. (2006). An analysis of lexical errors in the English compositions of Thai learners. Prospect, 21(3), 3–25.

Jackson, H. (2005). Good grammar for students. SAGE Publications.

James, C., Scholfield, P., Garrett, P., & Griffiths, Y. (1993). Welsh bilinguals’ English spelling: An error analysis. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 14(4), 287–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.1993.9994536

James, C. (1998). Errors in language learning and use: Exploring error analysis. Longman.

Klarer, M. (1999). An introduction to literary studies. Routledge.

Limengka, P. E., & Kuntjara, E. (2013). Types of grammatical errors in the essays written by fourth-semester students of English Department, Petra Christian University. Kata Kita: Journal of Language, Literature, and Teaching, 1(1), 230–238. https://doi.org/10.9744/katakita.1.1.230-238

Meyers, A. (2005). Gateways to academic writing: Effective sentences, paragraphs, and essays. Longman.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Nsimambote, R. (2012). Assessing the pronunciation of the spelled “s” in English words: The case of English students at the University of Kinshasa. RELAVIC, 7(1–2).

Richards, J. C., & Renandya, W. A. (Eds.). (2002). Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice. Cambridge University Press.

Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Trimasse, N. (2016). Investigating spelling errors of Moroccan EFL university students. Higher Education of Social Science, 10(6), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3968/8587

Downloads

Published

2026-09-22

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

1-10 of 139

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.