Evaluation of the agronomic performance of six tomato genotypes (Solanum lycopersicum L.) under the agroecological conditions of Ndjili-Brasserie/Kinshasa

Authors

  • Gilbert Atanda Botikale Domaine des Sciences Agronomiques et Environnement, Production végétale, B.P. 8815 Kinshasa-Ngaliema, RD Congo, Université Pédagogique Nationale Author
  • Vincent De Paul Kamanda Domaine des Sciences Agronomiques et Environnement, Production végétale, B.P. 8815 Kinshasa-Ngaliema, RD Congo, Université Pédagogique Nationale Author
  • Antoine Mumba Djamba Domaine des Sciences Agronomiques et Environnement, Production végétale, B.P. 8815 Kinshasa-Ngaliema, RD Congo, Université Pédagogique Nationale Author
  • Amand Mbuya Kankolongo Domaine des Sciences Agronomiques et Environnement, Production végétale, B.P. 8815 Kinshasa-Ngaliema, RD Congo, Université Pédagogique Nationale Author

Keywords:

Agronomic performance, tomato, genotype, market gardening, yield

Abstract

Five improved tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) varieties (Roma VF, Caraibo, Carioca, Roxana, and Xina) and a local population used as a control were evaluated from June to October 2023 under the agroecological conditions of Ndjili-Brasserie, Kinshasa. This study aimed to compare the agronomic performance of these six genotypes under the trial conditions. A randomized complete block design with four replications was used. Growth and production traits and the overall incidence of disease symptoms were analyzed by analysis of variance. Genotypes significantly affected plant height, number of branches, mean fruit weight, and fruit diameter, but not stem diameter at the collar, 50% flowering time, number of fruits, yield, or overall disease incidence. Xina had the greatest plant height (28.50 ± 2.88 cm) and the highest numerical yield (21.48 ± 9.81 t ha⁻¹), although yield did not differ significantly among genotypes. Roxana produced the heaviest fruits (40.96 ± 3.58 g). The local population had a high number of branches (4.00 ± 0.81 per plant) but produced the smallest and lightest fruits. No genotype was superior across all evaluated traits. Xina nevertheless showed an interesting productive trend under the conditions of this trial; multi-location and multi-season evaluations are required before conclusions can be drawn about its adaptation and performance stability.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anais, G., Manyri, J., & Vincent, C. (1987). Control of Southern bacterial wilt caused by Pseudomonas solanacearum (Smith) on tomatoes in the Caribbean. Proceedings of the Caribbean Food Crops Society, 23rd Annual Meeting. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.260409

Bihon, W., Ognakossan, K. E., Tignegre, J.-B., Hanson, P., Ndiaye, K., & Srinivasan, R. (2022). Evaluation of Different Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) Entries and Varieties for Performance and Adaptation in Mali, West Africa. Horticulturae, 8(7), 579. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8070579

Centre National de Recherche Agronomique et de Développement Agricole (CNRAD). (2026). Tomate – Xina. CNRADA. https://cnrada.org/semences-et-plants/tomate-xina/

Coulibaly, N. D., Fondio, L., N’gbesso, M. F., & Doumbia, B. (2019). Evaluation des performances agronomiques de quinze nouvelles lignées de tomate en station au centre de la Côte d’Ivoire. International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences, 13(3), 1565. https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v13i3.29

Cucurbit Genetics Cooperative. (2016). Vegetable cultivar descriptions for North America: Tomato (J–R). https://cucurbit.info/2016/06/tomato-j-r/

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). (2008). Catalogue of plant species and varieties in West Africa. https://www.fao.org/4/i0062e/i0062e.pdf

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2026). FAOSTAT: Crops and livestock products [Data set]. Retrieved August 11, 2026, from https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL

Institut national de la recherche agronomique. (2016). Liste des variétés de légumes obtenues ou co-obtenues par l’INRA encore inscrites en avril 2016. https://eng-gafl.paca.hub.inrae.fr/content/download/4118/47050

Masoodi, U. H., Shah, I. A., Emam, W., Tashkandy, Y., Mishra, P., Mishra, N., & Matuka, A. (2025). Analysis of yield stability and genotype–environment interaction for open-pollinated tomato varieties in the Kashmir Himalaya using the AMMI model. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 23107. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-07621-2

Mbuya, S. N., Kankonda, O. M., Fallah, N., Akutse, K. S., & Cokola, M. C. (2026). Comparative field efficacy of synthetic insecticides and plant extracts against Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera : Gelechiidae) in Lubumbashi, DR Congo. Scientific Reports, 16(1), 21790. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-52900-1

Mohammed Ali, U., Soresa, D. N., & Fufa, T. W. (2025). Tailoring Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) Traits to Microclimates: A Multilocation Evaluation of Yield and Quality Responses in Western Ethiopia. Scientifica, 2025(1), 6345142. https://doi.org/10.1155/sci5/6345142

Mulaji, K. C. (2011). Utilisation des composts de biodéchets ménagers pour l’amélioration de la fertilité des sols acides de la province de Kinshasa (République Démocratique du Congo). Thèse de doctorat, Université de Liège- Gembloux Agro-Biotech, 220p.

Muntaha, S., Nesa, N.-U.-, & Sagor, G. H. M. (2023). Genetic Dissection for Yield and Fruit Quality Traits in Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.): Fruit quality traits. European Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences, 5(5), 45‑53. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejfood.2023.5.5.734

National Aeronautics and Space Administration. (2026). POWER Data Access Viewer: Prediction Of Worldwide Energy Resources [Data set]. NASA Langley Research Center. Consulté le 11 août 2026 sur https://power.larc.nasa.gov/data-access-viewer/

Oficiul de Stat pentru Invenții și Mărci (OSIM). (1997). Soi de tomate (Lycopersicon lycopersicon (L.) Karst. ex Farw.) Roxana. Buletinul Oficial de Proprietate Industrială, 1/1997.https://osim.ro/wp-content/uploads/Publicatii-OSIM/BOPI Inventii/1997/bopi0197.pdf

Sánchez, A., Hernández, V., Hellín, P., Molina, E., Fenoll, J., & Flores, P. (2025). Agronomic performance and characteristics of traditional tomato varieties grown with low input conditions. Scientia Horticulturae, 350, 114307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2025.114307.

Sissoko, S., Camara, A. Y., Diawara, M. O., Diarra, A., Dembélé, I., Dolo, A., Katile, S. O., & Toure, K. (2024). Effects of two Ralstonia solanacearum strains on yield of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mills 1768) genotypes planted at three different planting seasons at the Sotuba Station, Sudano-Sahelian area of Mali. Journal of Stress Physiology & Biochemistry, 20(1), 125–136

Technisem. (2026). Carioca : Tomate ronde adaptée aux conditions humides. https://technisem.com/produit/carioca

Zannat, A., Hussain, M. A., Md Abdullah, A. H., Hossain, M. I., Saifullah, M., Safhi, F. A., Alshallash, K. S., Mansour, E., ElSayed, A. I., & Hossain, M. S. (2023). Exploring genotypic variability and interrelationships among growth, yield, and quality characteristics in diverse tomato genotypes. Heliyon, 9(8), e18958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18958.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-11

Similar Articles

1-10 of 59

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.